User Tools

Site Tools


violations

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
violations [2018/05/05 19:35] Managerviolations [2020/04/29 05:52] (current) – add robots meta Manager
Line 27: Line 27:
 ===== LA. R.S 23:967 and LA. R.S. 42:1169 ===== ===== LA. R.S 23:967 and LA. R.S. 42:1169 =====
 I was retaliated against after having notified Chad Thibodeaux and Stan Hippler via a computer system and software called Jira. LA. R.S. 42:1169 also applies here because, as a McNeese State University employee, I was classified as a public employee. I was retaliated against after having notified Chad Thibodeaux and Stan Hippler via a computer system and software called Jira. LA. R.S. 42:1169 also applies here because, as a McNeese State University employee, I was classified as a public employee.
 +
 +  * "Hale V. Touro, 886 So. 2d 120 (La. 2004)"
 +  * "Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R.  Wireless Corp., 217 F.3d 46 (1st Cir. 2000)"
 +  * "Fassold V. Justice 409 F.3d 178 (3rd Cir. 2005)"
 +  * "Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District, 329 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2003)"
 +  * "Fierros v. Texas Dept. of Health, 274 F.3d 187 (5th Cir. 2001)"
 +  * "Thomas v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice, 220 F.3d 389, 394 (5th Cir. 2000)"
 +  * "Abramson v. Wiliam Paterson College, 260 F.3d 265 (3rd Cir. 2001)"
 +  * "Che v. Massachussetts Bay Transportation Authority, 342 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2003)"
 +  * "Hite V. Vermeer, 446 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 2007)"
 +  * "Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks, 492 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 2007)"
 +  * "Fleeman v. Nevraska Park, 2008-STA-15 (DOL judge) (February 9, 2009), affirmed Administrative Review Board (May 28, 2010)"
 +  * "Centeno-Bernuy v. Perry, 202 F. Supp. 2d 128 (W.D. N.Y. 2003)”
  
 ===== Equal Opportunity Violations ==== ===== Equal Opportunity Violations ====
Line 33: Line 46:
 When the university secretly oppened up a new position and only allowed Patrick Eustis an opportunity to apply and get the job, they violated EEOC by discriminating against everybody other than Patrick Eustis. When the university secretly oppened up a new position and only allowed Patrick Eustis an opportunity to apply and get the job, they violated EEOC by discriminating against everybody other than Patrick Eustis.
 They did this on multiple occasions, first when they moved Patrick Eustis to the UCS when there was no such position available and secondly when they created a brand new "redesign" position. They did this on multiple occasions, first when they moved Patrick Eustis to the UCS when there was no such position available and secondly when they created a brand new "redesign" position.
 +
 +{{htmlmetatags>
 +metatag-robots=(index,follow,archive)
 +}}
violations.1525548914.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/05/05 19:35 by Manager