iMmoral State University Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: introduction » timeline
timeline

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
timeline [2018/06/10 15:41] – Managertimeline [2020/04/29 05:51] (current) – add robots meta Manager
Line 50: Line 50:
  
 ===== On July 18, 2017 ===== ===== On July 18, 2017 =====
-  * Unordered List ItemWithin 1 hour of my e-mail, Robert Spinks responded to my e-mail with the following summarized statements:+  * Within 1 hour of my e-mail, Robert Spinks responded to my e-mail with the following summarized statements:
     - He had an opportunity to review the Bar Order and the background behind its issuance.     - He had an opportunity to review the Bar Order and the background behind its issuance.
     - The university exercised its rights to bar me and that this was standard policy and I should contact Human Resources.     - The university exercised its rights to bar me and that this was standard policy and I should contact Human Resources.
Line 75: Line 75:
  
 ===== On August 9, 2017 ===== ===== On August 9, 2017 =====
-  * I provided supplemental information to Michael Snowden, mentioning how I sent an e-mail to George Bodin about my hostile work environment. I included information on where to find 3 to 10 years of supporting evidence, showing my consistent patterns and that treatment I was given by all of the parties. Referring to, of course, relevant information, such as being assigned to maintain a system that was already hacked and used to cause harm to others while simultaneously denying me the approval to properly resolve the issue. I referenced the git.mcneese.edu system, which contains numerous activity logs that include evidence of Patricks involvement (and lack thereof) where appropriate. I also mentioned the wiki.mcneese.edu, where I provided detailed information on my projects (proving how far out of my way I went to help and assist everybody I am involved with, including Patrick Eustis). I futhermore mentioned how Chad Thibodeaux had claimed that my calling out Patrick Eustis' violations were angry or hostile (despite my utter lack of hostility and anger).+  * I provided supplemental information to Michael Snowden, mentioning how I sent an e-mail to George Bodin about my hostile work environment. I included information on where to find 3 to 10 years of supporting evidence, showing my consistent patterns and that treatment I was given by all of the parties. Referring to, of course, relevant information, such as being assigned to maintain a system that was already hacked and used to cause harm to others while simultaneously denying me the approval to properly resolve the issue. I referenced the git.mcneese.edu system, which contains numerous activity logs that include evidence of Patrick's involvement (and lack thereof) where appropriate. I also mentioned the wiki.mcneese.edu, where I provided detailed information on my projects (proving how far out of my way I went to help and assist everybody I am involved with, including Patrick Eustis). I futhermore mentioned how Chad Thibodeaux had claimed that my calling out Patrick Eustis' violations were angry or hostile (despite my utter lack of hostility and anger).
  
 ===== On August 28, 2017 ===== ===== On August 28, 2017 =====
Line 96: Line 96:
   * I also received a very suspicious call from somebody claiming to be “Federal Investigator Luis” from the number (504) 595-2863. This individual was hostile and falsifying statements immediately after I made a statement. I became increasingly suspicious and asked if I could have some identifying information. He refused to give me any information other than that he is the only investigator with his name. Furthermore, he spent most of his type worrying about being recorded and little to no time about my actual case. By the end of the conversation, I felt that this guy is a fraud. He claimed that the EEOC does not handle cases of retaliation for complaining about harassment, retaliation about reporting ADA violations, or discrimination by denying equal opportunity employment. The very last one is absurd, because they are literally have the Equal Opportunity Employment in their agency name! He also told me that because I am filing against a State agency that I had to file at the state level, not the Federal level. Furthermore, the actions against me should be filed with the Department of Justice. This so called Federal Investigator further refused to provide the official response to my official filing.   * I also received a very suspicious call from somebody claiming to be “Federal Investigator Luis” from the number (504) 595-2863. This individual was hostile and falsifying statements immediately after I made a statement. I became increasingly suspicious and asked if I could have some identifying information. He refused to give me any information other than that he is the only investigator with his name. Furthermore, he spent most of his type worrying about being recorded and little to no time about my actual case. By the end of the conversation, I felt that this guy is a fraud. He claimed that the EEOC does not handle cases of retaliation for complaining about harassment, retaliation about reporting ADA violations, or discrimination by denying equal opportunity employment. The very last one is absurd, because they are literally have the Equal Opportunity Employment in their agency name! He also told me that because I am filing against a State agency that I had to file at the state level, not the Federal level. Furthermore, the actions against me should be filed with the Department of Justice. This so called Federal Investigator further refused to provide the official response to my official filing.
   * I the contacted  James L. Arruebarrena about this strange contact and James (strangely) suddenly started claiming that he did not understand my case (despite having previously described, in slight detail, such as the Constitutional violation in regards to Section 1983 of my Civil Liberties).   * I the contacted  James L. Arruebarrena about this strange contact and James (strangely) suddenly started claiming that he did not understand my case (despite having previously described, in slight detail, such as the Constitutional violation in regards to Section 1983 of my Civil Liberties).
-  * In case “Federal Investigator Luis” was not a fraud, I sent a certified mail (with return receipt request) (USPS #7016-3560-001-0318-8207) to the Office of the Governor, Louisiana Commission on Human Rights. At a later date, I received an unsigned and undated return receipt while the tracking code showed a different zip code than the one I mailed. Contacting the USPS, they directly said that certified mail sometimes does not get to the correct address and that the return receipts somehow get lost. They claimed that they would give me a refund and never did so. This is very suspicious behavior.+  * In case “Federal Investigator Luis” was not a fraud, I sent a certified mail (with return receipt request) ([[@/documentation/documents/tracking/usps%20-%20tracking%20and%20receipts%20-%2020190516200647052.pdf|USPS #7016-3560-001-0318-8207]]) to the Office of the Governor, Louisiana Commission on Human Rights. At a later date, I received an unsigned and undated return receipt while the tracking code showed a different zip code than the one I mailed. Contacting the USPS, they directly said that certified mail sometimes does not get to the correct address and that the return receipts somehow get lost. They claimed that they would give me a refund and never did so. This is very suspicious behavior.
  
 ===== On October 6, 2017 ===== ===== On October 6, 2017 =====
-  * In case “Federal Investigator Luis” was not a fraud, I sent a certified mail (with return receipt request) (USPS #7016-3560-001-0325-1611) to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. The return receipt I received was signed and dated on October 10, 2017.+  * In case “Federal Investigator Luis” was not a fraud, I sent a certified mail (with return receipt request) ([[@/documentation/documents/tracking/usps%20-%20tracking%20and%20receipts%20-%2020190516200647052.pdf|USPS #7016-3560-001-0325-1611)]]) to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section. The return receipt I received was signed and dated on October 10, 2017.
  
 ===== On October 10, 2017 ===== ===== On October 10, 2017 =====
Line 115: Line 115:
  
 ===== On October 30, 2017 ===== ===== On October 30, 2017 =====
-  * I sent a letter, asking for assistance with the EEOC (due to the suspicious phone call) to Senator. Bill Cassidy. I used USPS certified mail with return receipt, ID: 7017-1450-002-2978-6577. I have never received any response.+  * I sent a letter, asking for assistance with the EEOC (due to the suspicious phone call) to Senator. Bill Cassidy. I used USPS certified mail with return receipt, [[@/documentation/documents/tracking/usps%20-%20tracking%20and%20receipts%20-%2020190516200647052.pdf|USPS #7017-1450-002-2978-6577)]]. I have never received any response.
  
 ===== On October 31, 2017 ===== ===== On October 31, 2017 =====
-  * The Louisiana Board of Ethics sent me a letter (Signed by Deborah S. Grier), informing me that my docket would be tentatively scheduled for the December 14, 2017 meeting.+  * The Louisiana Board of Ethics sent me a letter (Signed by Deborah S. Grier), informing me that my docket would be tentatively scheduled for the December 14, 2017 meeting (docket number 2017-1205).
   * The Louisiana Commission on Human Rights sent me a letter (Signed by Dr. Leah Raby, Executive Director, LCHR) stating that because my case is against a State agency, that I should file at the Federal level. Which is strange, because it directly contradicts what “Federal Investigator Luis” stated. Not only that, they sent me a written, official, response. This gives me the impression that the New Orleans EEOC branch, or this so-called “Federal Investigator Luis” may somehow be unlawfully involved in the my retaliation case.   * The Louisiana Commission on Human Rights sent me a letter (Signed by Dr. Leah Raby, Executive Director, LCHR) stating that because my case is against a State agency, that I should file at the Federal level. Which is strange, because it directly contradicts what “Federal Investigator Luis” stated. Not only that, they sent me a written, official, response. This gives me the impression that the New Orleans EEOC branch, or this so-called “Federal Investigator Luis” may somehow be unlawfully involved in the my retaliation case.
  
Line 171: Line 171:
   * References that the provided Job posting that I received from McNeese is clearly incorrect (it is Michael Redlich's job posting).   * References that the provided Job posting that I received from McNeese is clearly incorrect (it is Michael Redlich's job posting).
     * I further emphasize that the requested posting is the one from the winter of 2015.     * I further emphasize that the requested posting is the one from the winter of 2015.
-  * I made the //Expidited Processing// request statement bold to be more emphasized.+  * I made the //Expedited Processing// request statement bold to be more emphasized.
   * Used a more correct format for a notary public signature than my previous request.   * Used a more correct format for a notary public signature than my previous request.
  
Line 177: Line 177:
   * McNeese State University has received by State FOIA Request, //Louisiana Public Records Act § 44:1 et seq//.   * McNeese State University has received by State FOIA Request, //Louisiana Public Records Act § 44:1 et seq//.
   * The package was signed by a //Williams// at 10:46 AM.   * The package was signed by a //Williams// at 10:46 AM.
-  * Package was shipped (and the FOIA Request was notarized by) the UPS Store and has a tracking code of **1Z251AE40303816592**.+  * Package was shipped (and the FOIA Request was notarized by) the UPS Store and has a tracking code of [[@/documentation/documents/tracking/Shipment Receipts%20-%2020190222170609605.pdf|1Z251AE40303816592]].
  
 ===== On May 9, 2018 ===== ===== On May 9, 2018 =====
Line 191: Line 191:
  
 ===== On May 23, 2018 ===== ===== On May 23, 2018 =====
-  * After research and review, I responded to the May 12, 2018 FOIA response. I clarified my initial response to ensure spam mail does not included.+  * After research and review, I responded to the May 12, 2018 FOIA response. I clarified my initial response to ensure spam mail does not get included.
  
 ===== On June 7, 2018 ===== ===== On June 7, 2018 =====
   * I received a response to my May 23, 2018 FOIA response. Of particular note is that they state "&&..the University has no recorded Jabber/Pidgin communications between Patrick Eustis and Andrew Mapley in 2016 and 2017&&". Which is interesting because I have documented evidence of just that in the Jira and e-mail logs as admitted by Andrew Mapley.   * I received a response to my May 23, 2018 FOIA response. Of particular note is that they state "&&..the University has no recorded Jabber/Pidgin communications between Patrick Eustis and Andrew Mapley in 2016 and 2017&&". Which is interesting because I have documented evidence of just that in the Jira and e-mail logs as admitted by Andrew Mapley.
 +
 +===== On June 26, 2018 =====
 +  * I notarized a signed and sworn to legal document **Pursuant to LSA R.S. 42:1169**.
 +  * The notarized document was copied to a dvd along with evidence and submitted along with the legal documents is secured using the sha256 checksum ''bd1ee70e815ef920d0c6d42be9523209187d07858dd944196a901a5c15b71f93''.
 +
 +===== After June 28, 2018 =====
 +  * I received an acknowledgement receipt dated June 28, 2018 (docket number 2018-775) from the Louisiana Board of Ethics in response to my legal document **Pursuant to LSA R.S. 42:1169**.
 +  * I would like to note that the Louisiana Board of Ethics has yet to bring docket number 2017-1205 to their meetings.
 +  * I would further note that docket number 2018-776 was received by the Louisiana Board of Ethics on the same day they received mine and they brought it to their meeting but have ignored mine (see: [[http://ethics.la.gov/publicweb/MeetingView.aspx?MeetingID=382|August 16, 2018 Meeting]] and [[http://ethics.la.gov/publicweb/bluesheet.aspx?ItemID=22374&MeetingID=382|Docket Number 2018-776]]).
 +
 +===== July 11, 2018 =====
 +  * I provided legal documents in specifically in regards to the **MSU police color of law violations** to both the FBI and the DOJ for their respective responsibilities in regards to the numerous violations by Robert Spinks.
 +  * This contains the same design and structure as **Pursuant to LSA R.S. 42:1169**, but focuses on the violations by the MSU Police.
 +  * The notarized document was copied to a dvd along with evidence and submitted along with the legal documents to the FBI is secured using the sha256 checksum ''7a06fa34a81bc073b7770721a82c703aa18b876abce91681519869245ce2e282''.
 +  * The notarized document was copied to a dvd along with evidence and submitted along with the legal documents to the DOJ is secured using the sha256 checksum ''8b3b0bcbe0c709ef48c09fc981786421e54c78c1b1931180cda3dd75946d548c''.
 +
 +===== July 11, 2018 =====
 +  * I received 2 e-mails from Eddie Meche, CPA (Vice President for Business Affairs and University Services).
 +  * The e-mails contain a very small number of e-mails in response to my FOIA request.
 +
 +===== August 17, 2018 =====
 +  * I received physical mail from DeCUIR, Clark & Adams, L.L.P., representing some of the FOIA response e-mails on a DVD.
 +  * The DVD contains incorrect e-mails that is very clearly and obviously not part of what was requested.
 +  * The DVD lacks a significant amount of e-mails.
 +  * The DVD does not contain any of the other information, such as Patrick Eustis' job position on the dates that were requested.
 +  * The DVD does not contain a list of what was omitted (if any) nor why anything was omitted.
 +  * The DVD has a sha256 checksum of ``f850a37ec2d1000950054c0f873fb14913825d3200ec29321a47d984b137ef75``.
 +
 +===== August 23, 2018 =====
 +  * I received a response from Suzanne Quinla Mooney of the Louisiana Board of Ethics claiming that Docket No. 2018-775 was reviewed on August 16, 2018.
 +  * They claimed that they were already investigating this according to docket no 2017-1205 and would consolidate 2018-775 into 2017-1205.
 +
 +===== On or before October 6, 2018 =====
 +  * I sent an amendment to 2018-775/2017-1205 to help clarify what was described in 2018-775.
 +  * 2018-775 is a //complaint filing// and is not a //request for advisory opinion// that 2017-1205 is.
 +  * I stated that I trust that by "folding" 2018-775 into 2017-1205 meant that 2017-1205 is now a //complaint filing//.
 +  * The first DVD copy I made had an invalid checksum due to my DVD burner failing.
 +  * After buying a new DVD burner, I recreated the checksum and confirmed its validity.
 +  * The (correct) DVD has a sha256 checksum of ``56809ef9b601e255ed8a7a00d2707abb28f08dbc07f2e54c0334504ba5d6baae``.
 +
 +===== On or before October 24, 2018 =====
 +  * I received a phone call from a Joel Manuel in regards to my whistleblower retaliation filing.
 +  * Joel claimed to not have received any of the evidence I provided (which was sent by tracking and is ensured by the checksums).
 +  * I sent Joel an [[emails_list#e-mail0359|e-mail on October 24, 2018]] containing a small piece of the evidence.
 +  * see
 +
 +===== November 11, 2018 =====
 +  * I once again send an FOIA Request to McNeese State University because they failed to fully and properly comply with my previous request.
 +  * I complained how they improperly omitted evidence.
 +
 +===== November 13, 2018 =====
 +  * I received a letter from DeCUIR, CLark & ADAMS, L.L.P, in response to my November 11, 2018 request, where they lie about having fulling complied with my FOIA request.
 +  * They do not seem to be aware that I have proof of their fraud given that I've requested information that I already have or already have evidence showing such records exist.
 +
 +===== November 19, 2018 =====
 +  * I re-mailed all of the evidence (along with updates) that was previously sent that Joel claims to not have received (UPS tracking number [[@/documentation/documents/tracking/Shipment Receipts%20-%2020190222170609605.pdf|1z251ae40397543326]]).
 +  * I then called Joel and he claimed that he did not receive the e-mail that I sent in October.
 +  * The DVD of evidence has a sha256 checksum of ``2f52086540e0368042dd354559f759c675dccdae1eda7248fd6939b8eae74cce``
 +
 +===== November 21, 2018 =====
 +  * UPS tracking information shows that [[@/documentation/documents/tracking/tracking - 1z251ae40397543326.pdf|1z251ae40397543326]] was received on 11/21/2018 at 20:04 am and signed by ``Victorian``.
 +
 +===== November 26, 2018 =====
 +  * I was sent a copy of letters sent to Stan Hippler and Chad Thibodeaux where the Lousiana Board of Ethics fraudelently claims not to have the evidence that I submitted (and that they signed for on November 21, 2018).
 +  * They decided to close the case due to insufficient evidence despite having been provided the extreme opposite.
 +
 +===== December 05, 2018 =====
 +  * My first attempt at an Administrative appeal is to (not knowing who above McNeese should handle this) is to the Louisiana Board of Regents.
 +  * I filed a complaint about McNeese State Universities failure to comply with the FOIA Request and provide reasons why (citing that I have evidence proving the existence of such records).
 +
 +{{htmlmetatags>
 +metatag-robots=(index,follow,archive)
 +}}
timeline.1528645279.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/06/10 15:41 by Manager